![]() 10/14/2019 at 19:44 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
$50 ,000 new. $16,998 seven years later with 61,000 miles.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 10/14/2019 at 19:57 |
|
nice price?
![]() 10/14/2019 at 19:58 |
|
I’m sure that awful red didn’t do it any favors.
![]() 10/14/2019 at 20:00 |
|
Spend more and get that sweet, sweet, twin-turbo V8
https://www.carmax.com/car/18178202
![]() 10/14/2019 at 20:01 |
|
You can get a W123 230E for that price.
Or a W126 560SEL.
I know which ones I’d rather have.
![]() 10/14/2019 at 20:06 |
|
These (C207s) are actually built on the W204 C-class interestingly enough.
![]() 10/14/2019 at 20:09 |
|
They would’ve been a CLK instead of an E-class coupe if Mercedes hadn’t changed the naming.
![]() 10/14/2019 at 20:10 |
|
True, but I always thought the CLKs tried to pass themselves off as two door E-class’s, both in price and in styling.
![]() 10/14/2019 at 20:18 |
|
Exactly! I was saying this thing should really have been a CLK hah
![]() 10/14/2019 at 20:18 |
|
No point in paying the Carmax premium unless you get the extended warranty.
Plenty of 2012 E550's in the $16,000 range if you want to roll the dice!
![]() 10/14/2019 at 20:26 |
|
Yes yes yes you want the TTV8!
![]() 10/14/2019 at 21:04 |
|
I think you’ll pay a premium for the coupe as they are not very common and yes; it’s a distinct car with a shorter wheelbase and no b pillar so you’re a boss in the thing.
![]() 10/15/2019 at 04:24 |
|
still sounds too much for a 7 year old mercedes with that mileage.
![]() 10/15/2019 at 11:00 |
|
But that’s not AWD :(
![]() 10/30/2019 at 20:35 |
|
I want to like it. I like the roll-down quarter window, the sharp headlights, and some other details... but even in red it still seems just a bit...
…. * MA GOO *
Just makes me wish that a used Audi S
5 had rear quarter windows that rolled down, as a sportier and better looking german AWD GT coupe.